You have the right to expect reasonable safety and to remain injury-free when entering another person's property. Thus, you may have a claim for premise liability if you are harmed on another person's […]
Legal findings that take place in other states oftentimes influence national laws and laws in other states over time. A recent finding in Nevada by the Supreme Court of that state may have implications down the line for premise liability claims filed in other states.
In a case filed against a major big-box retailer, the Nevada Supreme Court found that the fact that a dangerous condition may be open and obvious does not mean that the landowner doesn't have a duty to take care of someone who was injured on the property. This is a significant finding, since it would likely affect a lot of premise liability claims that are filed in other states across the nation.
The legal definition of "open and obvious" is obviously something that lawyers will likely be arguing in court over for a very long time. A little bit of common sense, however, reveals what a phrase like this likely means. A floor with a sign on it indicating that it is wet, for instance, would be an open and obvious hazard, according to any reasonable person, in all likelihood. What a finding like this means is that, simply because a property owner flags something as being dangerous doesn't mean that they can get away with not taking care of someone who was hurt on their premises.
Most premise liability claims are associated with slip and fall accidents. The reason for this is not, as some people who like to make a political issue out of lawsuits would have you believe, because people find these claims to be easy ways to get money. The reason that slip and fall accidents result in so many liability claims is simply because slip and fall accidents are oftentimes far more dangerous and devastating than people may assume. People are killed every year in slip and fall accidents.
If you're considering filing a premise liability claim, don't let the fact that there was some signage that was supposed to warn you of a hazard dissuade you from speaking with an attorney. Let the attorney take a look at the circumstances of your incident and determine whether or not it seems likely that you do have a chance of winning a lawsuit. You may find that the premises owner actually does have some liability for your injury and that you could stand to win compensation.
Note: The information that was utilized in this post was gathered from the use of secondary sources. This information used has not been confirmed or independently verified. If you locate any information that is not correct, please contact our firm as soon as possible so that we can make the appropriate corrections. If you find any information that is false, we will remove or correct the post immediately after it is brought to our attention.
Disclaimer: As a valued member of the Dallas community, Rasansky Law Firm’s goal is to improve the safety of all residents in the great state of Texas. These posts should not be viewed as a solicitation for business and the information included herein should not be taken as medical or legal advice. The photos used in this post are not representative of the actual crash scene.
Over 30+ Years Of Personal Injury Experience
Top-Rated and Award-Winning Personal Injury Lawyers
Attorneys Available to Discuss Your Case Now
No Fee Unless You Win
Free Confidential Consultation.
Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation with an experienced personal injury lawyer.